
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Why Economists Need Math</title>
<link>http://www.equalis.com/forums/posts.asp?topic=135342</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:03:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Sep 2010 23:06:29 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2010 Equalis - Where Engineering and Science Computes</copyright>
<atom:link href="http://www.equalis.com/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=135342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Why Economists Need Math</title>
<link>http://www.equalis.com/forums/posts.asp?topic=135342</link>
<guid>http://www.equalis.com/forums/posts.asp?topic=135342</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2006/09/why-aspiring-economists-need-math.html">A very interesting read</a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Sep 2010 00:14:43 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.equalis.com/forums/posts.asp?topic=135673</link>
<guid>http://www.equalis.com/forums/posts.asp?topic=135673</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<table class="tocArticle" width="100%"><tbody><tr valign="top"><td class="tocTitle"><a href="http://www.edusoft.ro/brain/index.php/brand/article/view/91">How
 much Mathematics does Economy Need? ...Or... Some Brief Epistemological
 Excursions into the Mathematics located on the border with Social 
Sciences</a></td>
	<td class="tocGalleys">
									<a href="http://www.edusoft.ro/brain/index.php/brand/article/view/91/186" class="file">PDF</a>
														
			</td>
</tr>
<tr>
	<td class="tocAuthors">
									Tiberiu Socaciu	</td></tr></tbody></table><br>http://www.edusoft.ro/brain/index.php/brand/article/view/91]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Sep 2010 20:58:55 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.equalis.com/forums/posts.asp?topic=135747</link>
<guid>http://www.equalis.com/forums/posts.asp?topic=135747</guid>
<description><![CDATA[A very interesting read, but it seemed a little heavy on the citations and a little low on the content. &nbsp;While it certainly mentioned a lot of information, it did not provide me with as much insight into the question that it posed as I would have liked. &nbsp;]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Sep 2010 00:06:29 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
